I've just returned to my desk with lunch: The 6-inch ham and turkey on wheat from Subway. I originally went to Subway to get a 6-inch turkey on wheat, which costs$3.97. I changed my order to a 6-inch turkey AND HAM on wheat when I realized that sandwich cost only $3.78. Perhaps some of my more financially-minded readers could help explain to me the economics behind this. You add a meat, and the sandwich decreases in price? That'd be like if a cheeseburger was 3 dollars, while a double cheeseburger was 2 dollars. And what stops me from buying the turkey and ham for 20 cents less, and then just removing the ham, so I can have a turkey sandwich? This sort of shrewd thinking is why I now have 20 more cents in my pocket than I otherwise would have. Calculations have revealed to me that in five years I could conceivably earn 365 extra dollars with this scheme. In 15 years I can have enough for that flat screen i've had my eye on. However much I enjoy saving money, I still cannot explain the sense of lowering the price of a sandwich as you add elements to it. But don't question what you don't understand, i've been told. Just save the 20 cents, get older, and spend away.
Comments (3)
I might need Kenny's junior financial analyst skills to confirm this, but if ham is say $0.19/oz cheaper than turkey, and each sandwich has 2 oz of meat, then:
turkey meat: 2 oz x $1.19 = $2.38 worth of meat
ham/turkey: 1 oz x $1.19 + 1 oz x $1.00 = $2.19
$2.38 vs. $2.19 is $0.19 in savings.
you're just swapping some expensive meat out for some cheap meat. but if you feel brilliant because of it, you go girl.
Posted by k-ro | January 27, 2007 12:48 PM
Posted on January 27, 2007 12:48
Only kenta thinks of mathematical formalas for sandwiches.
Posted by T. Haynes | January 29, 2007 1:10 PM
Posted on January 29, 2007 13:10
Hi Butt Muncher:
Do you like butts? Do you want to eat butts?
You eat butts! Mark eats butts!
Love,
your sister Lisa
p.s. Why did the vacuum cleaner suck up the dirt? So it could eat it!
Posted by Debbie | January 31, 2007 1:53 PM
Posted on January 31, 2007 13:53