The Big Three
For me to do three more blogs on Clinton, Obama, and Edwards is futile. They are so much in the media at this time of year, people should no about them. Also, I am tired of these blogs. However, to make my documentation complete, I will write a statements of each.
Edwards - I am not sure where he stands. His current MO is to slam Hilliary. this tactic is fine, but John, "You need to tell where you stand." He is not telling us what he will do once he is in office. His entire rhetoric is about condemning Clinton and her old school politics not working. If you are a true liberal, Edwards is your vote. As he thinks it is okay to read gay relationship stories to little kids in the classroom. There is nothing really conservative about this Southern Boy. You are basically getting John Kerry of 2004 in 2008, except for the fact Edwards is a smooth talker. My first thought of Edwards is that he does not have what it takes to win. He is in the running, but he needs to begin to define himself a little more.
Clinton - It is true. You basically love Hilliary or you hate her. She is a savvy politician who can wiggle her way out of a tough situation better than her man Bill. If you do listen to her speak, you will hear vagueness. She only once answered a question directly as her common practice is to say something that appeases everybody. Additionally, she typically answers in a manner that is inclusive of the other candidates to make it seem that they all agree with her and there are no differences. With Hilliary, you are getting somebody who as seen the dirty ways of the Oval Office. I do not know where she gets 35 years of experience from because she has only been a Senator during this century. She is polarizing and potentially will not be able to work across party lines due to excessive baggage from her husband and her senate term. Clinton tells us what she is for, but she is not admitting or specify details of what makes her different. Her claim of experience is hogwash because there is no experience that will make anybody ready to become the president of the US. The only person who can claim this advantage is Bill Richardson.
Barack Obama - Obama is the fresh face on the scene. He is realatively untainted by the political process. Unlike the other Big 2, he is doing a good job of what he wants to do and enough detail to differentiate himself between the other two. He says things that people may not want to here like raising the salary tax level to pay for health insurance on top of balancing the budget. This is not what I want to hear as I will soon be in that tax bracket, but you have to respect his view. A vote for Obama will be vote for an unknown an new direction. He for sure is more culturally aware than the other candidates and will use that to drive his foreign policy. He has a better opportunity to work across party lines than the other Big 2 as he seems to be more of a peace maker than a fire starter. The strike against Obama, is not his experience, it may be is the fact that he is black. However, it seems through recent polls that the country may be overlooking this fact. A good move on his part is that he is running on his platform of initiatives without crying out any race card. You cannot compare Obama to Jesse because Obama is much more intelligent, articulate, and has higher moral values. Obama is the JFK vote in this decade.